Posts Tagged Claude Rains

Champagne and pseudonyms; Notorious review

I couldn’t be more proud of my readership for kicking into gear over the past couple days.  Speaking of readership, I forget if I’ve named you all.  Mr. Menick has his VCA, what should I have?  The Eaters? Suggestions would be appreciated in the comments section.

Continuing along my delayed Hitchcock kick, I was inspired to finally watch Notorious by my discussion with the aforementioned seasoned blogger about Hitchcock during some downtime at a certain debate tournament at which a certain less-seasoned blogger made a certain sum of money for judging a certain activity.  He brought up that Notorious certainly deserved to be mentioned in the same breath as Rear Window, Psycho and Strangers on a Train (were those the three?), and was probably above any breath that involved Vertigo and North by NorthwestRope, I think we agreed, was probably not even part of the same respiratory system (in a…good way?).  So that pushed me over the edge into seeing a movie I was already planning on seeing.

So that was an incredibly roundabout way of simply saying that Notorious, directed by Mr. Alfredonius Hitchcock himself and written by some guy named Ben Hecht, (Just kidding.  You can’t be considered just “some guy” when you write two movies like Notorioius and Gilda in the same year.) is the movie I’m reviewing this time.   The absolute first thing that jumps out at me about this movie is the unique and interesting way it uses three of the biggest actors of the time: Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman and Claude Rains.  Well, that’s more fair to say of the first two than of Rains – we’ve established even within the humble confines of this blog that Mr. Rains was a chameleon; a god among character actors, who manages to make all of his roles complicated and interesting.

But enough hero worship of Claude; we’ll discuss him more specifically to this movie later, along with the other biggies.

Notorious is the story of Alicia Huberman (Bergman), the daughter of a German-American convicted of war crimes committed during World War II who is asked by the United States Federal Government to work undercover in Brazil trying to catch some of her father’s associates doing…bad things.  Her liaison, TR Devlin (Grant), whom she meets at a party she threw to drink until she can’t feel anymore in reaction to her father’s conviction, is the one who introduces her to the mission.  She accepts after being reminded how much she loves America (and thus hates Nazis), deciding to abandon a family friend who wanted to take her on a boat cruise of the world, I think.  While in Rio (by the sea-o) de Janeiro, awaiting assignment and generally just hanging out, guess what the pair do? Give up? They fall in love.

But when they get the assignment, they find that Alicia has to woo an old acquaintance who is all kinds of creepily in love with her in order to get information.  He’s Alex Sebastien, played by Claude Rains, and he’s a former Nazi socialite.  It would be pretty stupid to do plot summary from that point forward, for a number of reasons.

As far as Grant goes in this movie, it’s not the only time he was in a Hitchcock movie (I count three: this, To Catch a Thief, and North by Northwest), and though I haven’t seen To Catch a Thief, I know that in North by Northwest, Grant also has moments where he (Devlin) vilifies his love interest for being unfaithful to him while in the line of duty.  But here, what’s interesting is he never even gets attached to Alicia (Bergman) to begin with.  He doesn’t trust her because of her history, even though he falls for her, and his exchange with Alicia about her seduction of Sebastien is less about feeling hurt and betrayed, and more about taking sick satisfaction in twisting the knife over Alicia’s guilt about her mission.  The racetrack scene is just fascinating, and what happens immediately after is positively Hithcockian (duh).  But that’s too spoilable to talk about, regrettably.  You’ll just have to be satisfied with me telling you it rules.

Bergman’s Alicia character is an incredibly compelling one, and for my money it blows her performance in Casablanca out of the water because Alicia actually has depth – emotions that go beyond “I’m conflicted.”  This is an incredibly well-developed and fully-realized character, and I was so impressed by her subtlety of expression.

Claude Rains, though, is the absolute top dog here.  You’re introduced to him as Alex Sebastien, a former Nazi before he ever steps on screen, so my feelings towards his every action were that everything was coated with this sinister, invisible layer.  But the more I watched Alex around Alicia (which is 90% of his screen time), the more I came to realize that his feelings for her were sincere, despite his evildoings.  In reflection, I feel that Rains lent such depth to his character that I could analyze it til the cows came home, and still be interested.

So this review has kind of turned into boot-licking, and I’m going to cut it off there.  Just know that the strength of this movie is in the lead performances, possibly more than any other Hitchcock film.

Comments (2)

Catch the Ocean’s 13 reference; Lawrence of Arabia review

Four words: Pay-me-my-money! I’m really tired of not getting paid; my last summer job loved to play little jokes like paying me two dollars per delivery when I only had one delivery per night – plus tips, that was five dollars a night, basically.  Ah, those were hilarious jokes.  Now, despite repeated promises of “we’re not going to screw you”, I still have not been paid anything at my current job.  Hilarious, I must admit.

I’m really glad Lawrence of Arabia came on two discs.  It provided a nice stopping point for those of us who can’t commit four hours to a movie at once – you  know, normal people, people with jobs that don’t involve watching movies.  I’m now one of those people, only without the money that normally comes with it.  I’m still laughing.

It’s impossible to review this movie in any concise way like I’ve reviewed movies so far, so I’m going to bullet this one.

  • Writing: Impeccable.  There are so many lines that feel historic and monumental; the writing really suits a movie of such epic proportions.  I especially like the non-pejorative attitude towards the Arabs in the movie; it kind of reminds me of Syriana in that respect.  However, the quality of the writing could never have shone through if not for…
  • Acting: Also fantastic.  Though Peter O’Toole is great and idiosyncratic as Lawrence, Omar Sharif stole the movie for me, much as Alexander Siddig did as Prince Nasir in, you guessed it, Syriana.  Lots of parallels between the two – proud leaders of their people who wish to bridge the gap between the West and the Middle East while retaining cultural pride.  Also, it’s a brave casting move to have cast a real Arab in the role, though they didn’t quite have the guts to do the same for the part of Prince Feisal – they still have the fabulous Alec Guinness in that part, wearing brownface.
  • Directing: Very very good, but not visionary.  I wouldn’t disagree with any of the choices, and I especially like the decision to stage all action from left to right, to symbolize the film as a journey.  Still, everything about the movie semed like it wasn’t directed at all – like it was just a fantastic read-through.
  • Claude Rains: A real favorite of mine, he’s fantastic in everything he’s in, adding a wry smile to every movie from Casablanca to Mr. Smith Goes to Washington to this, which was basically his swan song.

This movie is a real commitment, but it’s one of those essentials that every movie fan should set time aside for – something that informs your opinion of all other movies and of what movies could be.

Comments (2)